Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
CMS_Phase-2_Proposal
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
adominguez2
CMS_Phase-2_Proposal
Commits
43fca9ae
Commit
43fca9ae
authored
11 years ago
by
Aaron Dominguez
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Final version with fixes to Cathy's spreadsheet from Ken.
parent
745a6617
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
3
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
abstract.tex
+1
-1
1 addition, 1 deletion
abstract.tex
material/Budget for Cathy.xlsx
+0
-0
0 additions, 0 deletions
material/Budget for Cathy.xlsx
phase-2_proposal.tex
+23
-20
23 additions, 20 deletions
phase-2_proposal.tex
with
24 additions
and
21 deletions
abstract.tex
+
1
−
1
View file @
43fca9ae
...
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
...
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
%% Added text about importance of vertex resolution for VBF phyiscs - CSH
%% Added text about importance of vertex resolution for VBF phyiscs - CSH
%%
%%
\linenumbers
%
\linenumbers
\begin{abstract}
\begin{abstract}
We propose a three year plan to begin R
\&
D on module and sensor
We propose a three year plan to begin R
\&
D on module and sensor
design for an upgrade to the CMS forward pixel detector in the far
design for an upgrade to the CMS forward pixel detector in the far
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
material/Budget for Cathy.xlsx
+
0
−
0
View file @
43fca9ae
No preview for this file type
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
phase-2_proposal.tex
+
23
−
20
View file @
43fca9ae
...
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
...
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
% A dummy comment line to test write access to the repository - please ignore
% A dummy comment line to test write access to the repository - please ignore
\linenumbers
%
\linenumbers
%%
%%
%% Rearranged text to introduce physics motivation up front and added text about importance of vertex resolution for this phyiscs - CSH
%% Rearranged text to introduce physics motivation up front and added text about importance of vertex resolution for this phyiscs - CSH
...
@@ -114,8 +114,9 @@ pixel disks on each side of the pixel barrel. A problem with this
...
@@ -114,8 +114,9 @@ pixel disks on each side of the pixel barrel. A problem with this
approach is that momentum and impact parameter resolutions degrade in
approach is that momentum and impact parameter resolutions degrade in
this far forward region due to geometry and tracks traveling more and
this far forward region due to geometry and tracks traveling more and
more parallel to the solenoidal magnetic field. This could be
more parallel to the solenoidal magnetic field. This could be
mitigated by increasing the pixel segmentation of the detector in this
addressed by increasing the pixel segmentation of the detector in this
far forward region. If (some of) the pixel layers provide timing information,
far forward region. If (some of) the pixel layers provide timing
information, and/or were tilted slightly to provide ``stereo layers,''
this could also mitigate losses in longitudinal impact parameter
this could also mitigate losses in longitudinal impact parameter
resolution. This would all have to be done without greatly increasing the
resolution. This would all have to be done without greatly increasing the
power, cooling and readout requirements.
power, cooling and readout requirements.
...
@@ -195,23 +196,25 @@ construction and testing is calculated in exactly the same way, but
...
@@ -195,23 +196,25 @@ construction and testing is calculated in exactly the same way, but
for FY15 and FY16. The test beam telescope could be considered
for FY15 and FY16. The test beam telescope could be considered
capital equipment and therefore should not have any IDC; it is assumed
capital equipment and therefore should not have any IDC; it is assumed
to consist of
\$
8k in parts and
\$
2k for PMTs for triggering. Labor
to consist of
\$
8k in parts and
\$
2k for PMTs for triggering. Labor
for the telescope assembly will be done by the UNL electronics shop
for the telescope assembly will be done either by the UNL or KU
with an estimated total of 2 weeks FTE. Travel to the test beam is
electronics shops with an estimated total of 2 weeks FTE. For the
not completely understood since it could occur as a trip from the US
purposes of estimating costs, we include the labor rates from UNL for
to Europe, or a trip to Fermilab, so an average between the two is
the telescope assembly, but the KU numbers would be very similar.
used; four people are assumed to be traveling to the test beam. The
Travel to the test beam is not completely understood since it could
sensor mask will be made by Tilman Rohe and he has paid 10k euros for
occur as a trip from the US to Europe, or a trip to Fermilab, so an
this in the past. The 20 wafer test run is estimated by Tilman to
average between the two is used; four people are assumed to be
cost 15k euros. UNL and KU would each take one trip to PSI each year,
traveling to the test beam. The sensor mask will be made by Tilman
whereas OSU would take two trips to PSI each year in order to get
Rohe and he has paid 10k euros for this in the past. The 20 wafer
better integrated into the project, since they are relatively new
test run is estimated by Tilman to cost 15k euros. UNL and KU would
collaborators with the Swiss groups. Similarly, UNL will take two
each take one trip to PSI each year, whereas OSU would take two trips
trips to FNAL each year, KU would take one and OSU take two. OSU
to PSI each year in order to get better integrated into the project,
would be using the off-campus IDC rate for travel, whereas KU and UNL
since they are relatively new collaborators with the Swiss groups.
would have to use the on-campus rates since the there will be
Similarly, UNL will take two trips to FNAL each year, KU would take
on-campus work done and their respective sponsored programs offices
one and OSU take two. OSU would be using the off-campus IDC rate for
require one IDC rate to be used. The USD to euro exchange rate is the
travel, whereas KU and UNL would have to use the on-campus rates since
average of the previous year to date.
the there will be on-campus work done and their respective sponsored
programs offices require one IDC rate to be used. The USD to euro
exchange rate is the average of the previous year to date.
\begin{figure}
[!ht]
\begin{figure}
[!ht]
\centering
\centering
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment